Supplier Data Checklist
Request and review supplier-provided emissions data consistently, field by field.
This checklist is published by OCEANS™ Sustainability, carbon-accounting software from TheEvenity Pvt Limited built for growing US manufacturers, to help your team request and review supplier-provided emissions data consistently — whether you're sending a data request to a priority supplier or reviewing what one has sent back.
How to use this checklist
Work through it once per supplier response. For every field, capture: was it provided, is it usable as-is, and does anything need to be flagged as an estimate or limitation before it goes into your inventory. A response missing several of these fields isn't necessarily unusable — but the gaps should be recorded, not silently filled in.
Supplier identity
- Supplier legal or trading name
- Internal supplier ID or account number, if your systems track one
- Contract or purchase-order reference the data relates to
Product or material
- Product or material identifier (SKU, grade, or part number)
- Plain-language description of the product or material
- Category it falls under in your own inventory (e.g. purchased goods, packaging, a specific commodity)
Quantity and unit
- Physical quantity actually supplied in the period (not just an invoice or spend total)
- Unit of measure, matched to how the supplier tracks it internally
- Confirmation the quantity reflects what was delivered, not what was ordered
Reporting period covered
- Start and end date of the period the figures represent
- Confirmation the period aligns with (or can be mapped to) your own inventory period
Footprint boundary
- What life-cycle stages are included (e.g. cradle-to-gate, gate-to-gate, cradle-to-cradle)
- What is explicitly excluded from that boundary
- Whether the boundary matches what your inventory needs, or requires an adjustment before use
Calculation method used by the supplier
Record which of the four GHG Protocol Scope 3 Category 1 methods the supplier actually used — this determines how much confidence to place in the figure:
- Supplier-specific method — calculated from the supplier's own facility- or product-level activity data and factors
- Hybrid method — a mix of supplier-specific and secondary (average) data
- Average-data method — secondary emission factors applied to the supplier's own reported activity data
- Spend-based method — an industry-average factor applied to spend, with no physical activity data behind it
Allocation approach
- How the supplier apportioned emissions to your specific order, if they serve multiple products or customers from the same production run
- The allocation basis used (e.g. mass, spend, revenue, physical units)
- Whether that allocation basis is documented well enough to defend if questioned
Emission-factor source and version
- Name of the factor database or source used, if any (e.g. a recognized industry or government database)
- Version or publication year of that factor
- Confirmation the factor's boundary matches the footprint boundary reported above
Supporting evidence
- What documentation backs the figure (a calculation worksheet, a third-party report, an internal methodology note)
- Whether that documentation was actually provided, or only referenced
- Contact point for follow-up questions on the calculation
Assurance or verification status
- None — the figure is unverified
- Self-reported — reviewed internally by the supplier but not independently checked
- Third-party reviewed — and at what scope (the specific figure, the underlying methodology, or the supplier's broader inventory)
Known limitations
- What the supplier has flagged as estimated, excluded, or uncertain in their own figure
- Any limitation you've identified during review that the supplier didn't flag themselves
- Whether those limitations are material enough to affect how the figure should be used
Marking status
Once a supplier response has been reviewed against this checklist, mark it Complete, Partially complete, or Not usable as-is. A "Partially complete" response with clearly documented gaps is more valuable to your inventory than a complete-looking figure with no visibility into how it was built — the gap itself is information, and it belongs in your record alongside the number.
- Author
- OCEANS™ content team
- Published
- September 2026
- Last reviewed
- September 2026
- Methodology basis
- GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard
- Applicable geography
- General — not jurisdiction-specific
- Material limitations
- A field-by-field checklist for requesting and reviewing supplier data; it does not replace a full audit or third-party verification process.
Guides provide general educational information. Legal, accounting, assurance, and regulatory decisions should be reviewed with appropriately qualified advisers.
Want closer support putting this into practice? Become a Founding Design Partner and help shape how OCEANS™ Sustainability handles it.